![]() |
June 18, 2004![]() |
||
Remote Viewing Ninja Very Remote, An Annoyed and Greedy Applicant, Our Challenge Application Files, Offer to Research a Subject, The Fabulous Rolling Baba, Quackery In Big Business, An Excellent Example of Nuttery, Clever Hans Lives, Ivory Tower Politics In Action, Veterinary Quackery, and In Conclusion….
Table of Contents:
REMOTE-VIEWING NINJA VERY REMOTE
A former CIA "remote viewer" presented the "facts" that the CIA used remote viewers to search for Russian missile sites and that our government paid millions of dollars to study ESP. If our government believed in it then it must be true. He matter-of-factly stated that Ninjas could easily have trained to perform/enter altered states of consciousness and see the locations of targets, even what room and what floor of the castle they might be in. To further prove this [by a demonstration], he brought in a team of remote viewers, briefly said a few words on how they were kept from knowing anything about the target or the location, and had them use their powers to locate him [a target]. They presented the results with much excitement.
Half of the remote viewers were very close to the target and one was dead on. Furthermore, they all saw that the target was male, and had a beard. Amazing! Who wouldn't be a believer after this triumph of paranormal studies? Somehow I don't think your million dollars will be going anywhere. They even showed the smug psychics as they were brought to the house and exclaimed things like "Yes, there's the arch I saw!" It was painful to watch, to say the least. There was one token skeptic, a Ninja historian who insightfully stated that the idea of psychic Ninja is absurd. He said that they used unheard-of stealth, a network of spies, and multiple recon missions prior to an assassination attempt. They wanted the enemy to think they had magical and psychic powers, and milked the resultant paranoia for all it was worth.
It saddens me to see what passes for science. Did the producers of the show want something paranormal so badly that they were blind to blatant fraud on the part of the remote viewers, or were they part of the chicanery? If you can't trust the Discovery channel or the Learning channel, then what choices do people have for themselves or their children to obtain entertaining but accurate information? Clay, I must say that from your description, I don't know that "fraud" was actually proven, though I didn't see that show. However, as for the ethics involved, the producers just don't care. They only want to please sponsors, and uncritical presentations like this are just the ticket for that purpose. The Discovery channel discovered that their survival depends on nonsense, so it's their biggest product….
AN ANNOYED AND GREEDY APPLICANT I'm well aware that I don't have to convince you of the silliness of so many of the applications that come in to the JREF re the million-dollar prize. However, even though what follows is not a formal application from "Rudy of clan Campbell," I had to admire the relatively clever get-out-of-it-in-advance gimmick used here. All spelling and grammar are as in the original e-mail messages from this angry, disorganized, man who is so threatened by the challenge:
You may contact me through this email. I'll be expecting to hear back from you petaining this e-mail. Umm, well, I only answered "petaining" his message by asking if I might use the tirade above, but I told him that coming up with another two million is currently out of the question. Now, from my experience of such matters, I'd guess that "Rudy" has come upon a photograph with a defect of some sort, a fuzzy smear that he's decided is paranormal. Amateurs just can't accept that there are often minor variations of this sort in photos, and they attribute great meaning to them just as some "find" patterns in tea leaves or clouds that were "arranged" for them by mystical powers. And offering the Dalai Lama as an expert in such matters is like Gene Autry defining calculus. "Rudy" replied to me, after flipping his silver cord out of the way, again with his original spelling and grammar:
Okay, I figured that now he'd dropped his price, we might do business. I told him he only had to fill out the form, stating what he'd do, under what circumstances, and with what accuracy. Ah, but the following disjointed text arrived next, so hope for his participation rapidly faded. Again, this is his spelling and grammar, so you won't think I need editorial help:
The overdone pomposity, arrogance, and ignorance, are well displayed here. Now, this may be only a juvenile with access to a keyboard, but experience has shown me that even fully-grown adults can also show these characteristics. It's apparent that "Rudy" is only blathering out his anger and frustration, so I don't think that we'll be hearing any more from him. But, I'd sure hate to miss getting the "Essence In Pure Display," whatever that may be. I hope I can sell it on EBay. And I'll take a small bowl of that Sacred Rupakaya, please. No, no, you taste it first…!
OUR CHALLENGE APPLICATIONS FILES
65 "open" files And more arrive regularly to keep Kramer busy...
Dr Karl Spracklen, of Leeds Metropolitan University in the UK, refers to a recent item that appeared here titled, "Whose Team Are You On":
If anyone has a large grant they want to give someone to examine the socialisation of unreason through sport I'd be happy to talk! Or alternatively, if there are academics out there looking at irrationality and are interested in what sociology of sport can bring to the discussion, please get in touch and we might find some joint papers/projects to work on. I can be contacted via e-mail on k.spracklen@leedsmet.ac.uk
Reader Chris Wuestefeld does some calculations for us:
The article tells about an Indian "Baba" who rolls down the road to promote peace by demonstrating his love for everything even the road we walk on. He rolls down the road like a log, reportedly traveling hundreds or thousands of miles. The first problem with this article is the report of the speeds he is able to attain. From the article:
My waist is a bit less than 36 inches in circumference. The baba seems much smaller than I, but let's give him the benefit of the doubt. Use 36" as the circumference of the rolling cylinder that his body forms. A mile = 63,360 inches. 1mph = 63,360 inches/hour = 1056 inches/minute. I must roll at about 29 RPM to achieve 1mph, or about 1 roll every 2 seconds. To achieve 6 mph I must therefore roll at 176 RPM three revolutions every second, which seems unlikely except down a very steep hill.
To achieve 15 mph I must roll at 440 RPM 7.3 revolutions every second. I submit that this is impossible to do without mechanical aid, and if you tried, I bet your brains would come out your ears. The bottom line, then, is a reporter who is more interested in a sensational story than in doing the most elementary fact-checking to ensure an accurate story.
The second problem is every bit as bad, in a different way. Again from the story: More than 60 people came for faith healing, including a blind boy, a boy with a lame leg, an old woman with a headache and a man with piles. After each treatment, he handed out what one of his disciples said were holy ashes [inside] pages torn from a school biology text. How sad this is, destroying a biology text which might really help someone by teaching a scientist who eventually discovers a cure to support faith "healing."
It must seem to you, Randi, like you're fighting the hydra. Every time you cut a head off the beast, there are more there to continue their menace. No comment……
Reader Brett Campbell is incensed:
When you kick off your shoes at the end of the day and put your feet up, you may be doing your whole body a favor. Foot Reflexology, based on the premise of the unique relationship of the feet to the entire human anatomy, can decrease pain, increase circulation, reduce stress and tension, and help eliminate symptoms (Symptoms? Symptoms of what? Nice and vague). Reflexology is a comprehensive holistic approach for people of all ages that works to improve the neurological, biochemical, and electrical functioning of the body (Big words meaning nothing). In other words, the mind, body, and spirit are all affected during a typical session, whether you need a general tune-up or are trying to return to health. (The spirit too? There's nothing reflexology can't do!) The vast majority of people realize the benefits of reducing stress (Duh!), which in turn minimizes physical symptoms. (Again, symptoms of what?) Self-help reflexology is effective, but nothing beats a session given by a certified professional. (Ka-ching!) We've asked our friends at the Reflexology Association of America to point out a few places on the foot and the corresponding symptoms reflexology can address. (Friends, eh? I wonder if any money changed hands, or at least a few sandals.) So relax, put your feet up, and give reflexology a try. We think you'll feel better all over. (Except in your wallet!).
Let me just add a couple of more things, and then pose a question. I think it is completely irresponsible for a large international company to be promoting quackery. I think that Land's End should be ashamed of themselves and I have told them that. I have also told them to take me off of their mailing list because I have no intention of supporting a company that supports ignorance. Last, I would just like to ask you how did this junk-medicine make it into the mainstream? They have a Reflexology Association of America, for crying out loud! What a smart bunch that must be! I always thought reflexology was for the nut fringe, but it looks like I was wrong. Somehow the nut fringe has shifted towards the respectable center, and I don't like it one bit!
AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF NUTTERY It's pretty well impossible to get across to the average person just how nutty the "spirit photography" notion is. Our library has several books devoted to this idea, and even a quick romp through that swamp results in an improved understanding of how pervasive the problem can be. However, reader Dominic Kearney has provided us with a website that does the job very nicely indeed. It's written and supported by staunch believers who have perfected the art of rationalization, as you'll see by going to www.crystalinks.com/photo.html. Just be sure that you're seated, because you could hurt yourself falling over in hysterics….
Exactly a century ago, the celebrated Kluge Hans (Clever Hans) was a major celebrity in Germany for a horse, that is. He was touted by scientists as being able to answer questions and do calculations, and this misunderstanding of simple unconscious cuing of an animal has become the classic, clinical example of such an error. In 1927, in the USA, Dr. Joseph Banks Rhine the ESP researcher of fame came upon "Lady Wonder," another example of this type of circus act, and was totally fooled by the performance. Well, the Germans may have done it again.
What brought about all this excitement? The German researchers reported they'd found that Rico knows the names of dozens of play toys and can find the one called for by his owner. Well, I'd have to see more about that large number 200 but there's no big revelation in the fact that animals, dogs in particular, can develop recognition of a large number of spoken words. And, border collies are a rather exceptionally intelligent and teachable breed. The big "leap of faith" here is in extrapolating so much from that basic fact the recognition of sentences and assembled phrases. That's a very big leap indeed. No, folks, I'd need much more evidence to conclude that Rico or any other dog can be "talked to" and would understand rather than just being urged to react to a word and identify the object or action that it represents. One item that hit the media was the fact that when commanded to retrieve an unfamiliar item by use of a new identifying name, Rico goes to the target pool and selects out the "new" item. I don't find it difficult to accept that such a smart canine could be trained to look for a new object in the target pool when it hears a new word in the command, but it cannot be extrapolated that Rico understands the intricacies of associating that new word with that object, from then on. And, remember, this is a trained performing dog, an actor who learns stunts - not just any pooch. It's showbizness, folks! But I'm willing as always to be shown. No hard feelings, Rico. Fetch the wallet…..!
IVORY TOWER POLITICS IN ACTION Our friend Daniel Sabsay (http://home.pacbell.net/sabsay/home) noted that Dr. Jacques Benveniste, the ardent endorser of homeopathy or at least of "digital information" stored in water (?) seemed to have neglected his promises to keep breathless fans notified of progress in establishing dilution-to-zero as a legitimate medical tool. On the February 5, 1999 Digibio website (www.digibio.com) Daniel found exciting news about "a second [automated testing] machine ... which is now in an external laboratory where independent researchers will perform the experiment in the coming weeks." Then, in January of 2001 there appeared yet another announcement about "the automatization of the plasma coagulation protocol," which was then not heard about further. Suggested Daniel, writing to Dr. Benveniste last week, "The world has given you the benefit of the doubt for three and a half years. We are still waiting for the progress report you have promised us." Well, Dr. Benveniste responded, asking:
And he signed the request in a manner that left no doubt whatsoever that he was not to be trifled with by being coaxed into corresponding with an insufficiently-lettered nobody:
See www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4152521,00.html.htm and www.weirdtech.com/sci/expe.html#qui. We have here the symptoms of what I have designated, "The Ivory Tower Syndrome," that strange inability to communicate with other humans who have no academic standing. It is often exhibited by PhDs, and there is no known remedy. To Benveniste's formidable array of credentials he appended this quotation:
I'm very happy to see that Dr. Benveniste is so dedicated to the memory of Dr. Bernard (1813-1878), an honored French researcher who insisted upon original research, and who developed the science of experimental physiology; a university in Lyon is named after him. That dedication is about to be tested. You see, homeopaths have what they would refer to as their "reigning theory," the idea that homeopathy works. Science has come up with more than one "new fact" that does not fit with homeopathy a number of disconfirming tests of the claims made by those who favor Hahnemann's notion. In case Benveniste chooses not to accept those findings, we can now announce that a new, improved, comprehensive, definitive, acceptable, set of tests of homeopathy will shortly be underway….! Yes, as soon as the funding's in place, we'll start in. This protocol is interesting in that the homeopaths themselves will make the decisions on whether or not their patients received the "real" homeopathic substance, or the control substance. This will be a prolonged, thorough, series, with a very adequate database and a totally double-blind setup, done on an international scale. Before I get mail telling me the obvious, that no matter how large and deep the resulting data file is, we won't have proven homeopathy to be either real or imaginary, I'll admit that right here and now. When it turns out to be a failure for the believers, those who were not involved will deny the competence of those who were. All sorts of excuses and alibis will be produced, cheating on our part will be alleged, despite the total approval and participation of the "other side," and we'll not hear one murmur about the obvious-to-others possibility that maybe, just maybe, there was nothing to this quackery in the first place. To exhibit my good faith and co-operation, I've agreed that in this specific case, and this case only, the JREF will waive the necessity of the usual preliminary test for our million-dollar prize; this was the only way that we could get important people in the homeopathic community to become involved. Also, you should know that the major cost in carrying out this project, is paying the homeopaths. Yes, we're going to pay them to try for the million-dollar prize! Their insistence on this provision, I think, was to provide them with a way of not having to do the test. That requirement was met, and it appears that they are now committed to doing it. No, I'm well aware that they'll come up with some other way of weaseling out; they're very experienced at that task…. But stay tuned….
Dr. Mike Eslea is with the Department of Psychology at the University of Central Lancashire, UK. He's dismayed, as a scientist and rational person, by what he's been offered:
There are literally dozens of statements here worthy of a Nobel prize, if true. My favorite is the explanation of spiritual healing on p181, but the entries for radionics (p181) and crystals and gems (p180), run it close. She acknowledges early on (p178) that there is no evidence for most of the therapies she cites, but then says that they have "in many instances...been proven to bring about apparently miraculous cures."
According to Davis, the worst that can happen is that the therapies have no effect: she does not consider the many possibilities for direct harm (e.g. from dodgy herbal concoctions, inappropriate manipulations, etc.) or indirect harm (when people do not get proper treatment for what might be a serious ailment). This leads her to the most appalling conclusion (in the FAQ on p179) that dog owners, not vets, should decide what treatment the dog needs! If you don't like your vet's opinion, just find another vet! In other words, if your pet is in pain, drag it round town until you find a vet dim enough (or greedy enough) to pander to your moronic superstitions. Isn't that a direct incitement to animal cruelty? Doctor, This is another case of someone out of their area of expertise, though I hardly think you have to be a mental giant to see the fallacy of "radionics" or the inanity of ascribing powers to crystals.
I visited with Martin Gardner about to turn 90 years of age! in the company of Jamy Ian Swiss, this last week. A report will go up here. We've received a really presumptuous series of postings from a film company that is sure they have discovered children who can read while blindfolded in Russia, China, and Mexico. And they want the JREF million. Can you say, "Lulova"? More about this next week. And you'll see an article by the late Isaac Asimov on Ronald Reagan….
|